<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lessons from LucidEra on BI for the mid-market</title>
	<atom:link href="http://datadoodle.com/2009/08/03/lessons-from-lucidera-on-selling-bi-to-the-mid-market/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://datadoodle.com/2009/08/03/lessons-from-lucidera-on-selling-bi-to-the-mid-market/</link>
	<description>Where the humans meet analytics and related subjects</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 15:33:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Do you Postmortem? 5 Key Pre-Market Launch Questions &#171; Marketing &#38; BizDev Lessons from the Front Lines</title>
		<link>http://datadoodle.com/2009/08/03/lessons-from-lucidera-on-selling-bi-to-the-mid-market/comment-page-1/#comment-752</link>
		<dc:creator>Do you Postmortem? 5 Key Pre-Market Launch Questions &#171; Marketing &#38; BizDev Lessons from the Front Lines</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 21:02:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://datadoodle.com/?p=882#comment-752</guid>
		<description>[...] We dug up a bit of history, found an insightful blog entry, a self-analysis written by the CEOs of the trailblazing firm LucidEra -successful, seasoned entrepreneurs, happy customers, “white” space, offering an attractive business proposition and offering flexibility in business model to make it work. But ultimately they just did not get enough customers off the ground. So what went wrong? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] We dug up a bit of history, found an insightful blog entry, a self-analysis written by the CEOs of the trailblazing firm LucidEra -successful, seasoned entrepreneurs, happy customers, “white” space, offering an attractive business proposition and offering flexibility in business model to make it work. But ultimately they just did not get enough customers off the ground. So what went wrong? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geschäftsmodelle: Freemium und seine Tücken » startwerk.ch</title>
		<link>http://datadoodle.com/2009/08/03/lessons-from-lucidera-on-selling-bi-to-the-mid-market/comment-page-1/#comment-735</link>
		<dc:creator>Geschäftsmodelle: Freemium und seine Tücken » startwerk.ch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 17:35:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://datadoodle.com/?p=882#comment-735</guid>
		<description>[...] die schnelle Adaption durch viele User. Software-as-a-service-Anbieter LucidEra hat zum Beispiel schlechte Erfahrungen damit gemacht, ein zu komplexes Produkt [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] die schnelle Adaption durch viele User. Software-as-a-service-Anbieter LucidEra hat zum Beispiel schlechte Erfahrungen damit gemacht, ein zu komplexes Produkt [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A matter of words? Business Intelligence versus Data visualization -bimehq.com</title>
		<link>http://datadoodle.com/2009/08/03/lessons-from-lucidera-on-selling-bi-to-the-mid-market/comment-page-1/#comment-669</link>
		<dc:creator>A matter of words? Business Intelligence versus Data visualization -bimehq.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 08:58:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://datadoodle.com/?p=882#comment-669</guid>
		<description>[...] as Ted highlighted in his interesting post, &#8220;be wary of users’ ability to analyze data&#8221; (lessons from Lucidera on BI for the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] as Ted highlighted in his interesting post, &#8220;be wary of users’ ability to analyze data&#8221; (lessons from Lucidera on BI for the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ajay Dawar</title>
		<link>http://datadoodle.com/2009/08/03/lessons-from-lucidera-on-selling-bi-to-the-mid-market/comment-page-1/#comment-646</link>
		<dc:creator>Ajay Dawar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 18:01:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://datadoodle.com/?p=882#comment-646</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know if freemium will work or not, for BI. There is an interview by Eric Schmidt (of Google) that they try to craft business models around free. It is an interesting strategy.

That said, I think we need to go back to basics. Whenever there is something new introduced in the market an incentive is needed for people to consider the new offering. Free, is one of the most tried and tested incentives. I wouldn&#039;t measure Freemium&#039;s effectiveness based on a company going under - there are too many factors that may have caused the company going under. Drawing a cause and effect line between Free and a company going under is over-simplifying.

&quot;Free&quot; is supposed to encourage consideration, not necessarily purchase. If a &quot;Free&quot; offering encouraged adequate consideration in the intended segment, then it worked and if it did not, then it did not work. That is why, I agree with Byron Igoe&#039;s comment - it is about evaluation, not purchase.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know if freemium will work or not, for BI. There is an interview by Eric Schmidt (of Google) that they try to craft business models around free. It is an interesting strategy.</p>
<p>That said, I think we need to go back to basics. Whenever there is something new introduced in the market an incentive is needed for people to consider the new offering. Free, is one of the most tried and tested incentives. I wouldn&#8217;t measure Freemium&#8217;s effectiveness based on a company going under &#8211; there are too many factors that may have caused the company going under. Drawing a cause and effect line between Free and a company going under is over-simplifying.</p>
<p>&#8220;Free&#8221; is supposed to encourage consideration, not necessarily purchase. If a &#8220;Free&#8221; offering encouraged adequate consideration in the intended segment, then it worked and if it did not, then it did not work. That is why, I agree with Byron Igoe&#8217;s comment &#8211; it is about evaluation, not purchase.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: O Reilly</title>
		<link>http://datadoodle.com/2009/08/03/lessons-from-lucidera-on-selling-bi-to-the-mid-market/comment-page-1/#comment-643</link>
		<dc:creator>O Reilly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 00:50:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://datadoodle.com/?p=882#comment-643</guid>
		<description>I wouldn&#039;t characterize LucidEra as a good model to take lessons from. They had a lazy BI salesforce dept that didn&#039;t care to follow up. Read Havard Business Reviews about what makes a performant organization - there&#039;s the differentiator.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t characterize LucidEra as a good model to take lessons from. They had a lazy BI salesforce dept that didn&#8217;t care to follow up. Read Havard Business Reviews about what makes a performant organization &#8211; there&#8217;s the differentiator.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitted by steve_dodd</title>
		<link>http://datadoodle.com/2009/08/03/lessons-from-lucidera-on-selling-bi-to-the-mid-market/comment-page-1/#comment-642</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitted by steve_dodd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 01:27:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://datadoodle.com/?p=882#comment-642</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was Twitted by steve_dodd [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was Twitted by steve_dodd [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Byron Igoe</title>
		<link>http://datadoodle.com/2009/08/03/lessons-from-lucidera-on-selling-bi-to-the-mid-market/comment-page-1/#comment-641</link>
		<dc:creator>Byron Igoe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 00:18:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://datadoodle.com/?p=882#comment-641</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the article. I can understand the concerns people have about freemium, since it can feel like a bait-and-switch.

We&#039;re positioning our free service more as an evaluation tool, lowering the barriers to trying our enterprise BI software. Let me know what you think: http://visualizefree.com

-Byron</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the article. I can understand the concerns people have about freemium, since it can feel like a bait-and-switch.</p>
<p>We&#8217;re positioning our free service more as an evaluation tool, lowering the barriers to trying our enterprise BI software. Let me know what you think: <a href="http://visualizefree.com" rel="nofollow">http://visualizefree.com</a></p>
<p>-Byron</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Software pricing: When does freemium really work? » Andreas Goeldi</title>
		<link>http://datadoodle.com/2009/08/03/lessons-from-lucidera-on-selling-bi-to-the-mid-market/comment-page-1/#comment-635</link>
		<dc:creator>Software pricing: When does freemium really work? » Andreas Goeldi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 22:01:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://datadoodle.com/?p=882#comment-635</guid>
		<description>[...] free versions of its products pretty well. Startups like photo sharing site Phanfare and the recently demised LucidEra (a vendor of SaaS business intelligence) tried freemium models, but weren&#8217;t successful. And [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] free versions of its products pretty well. Startups like photo sharing site Phanfare and the recently demised LucidEra (a vendor of SaaS business intelligence) tried freemium models, but weren&#8217;t successful. And [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil Raden</title>
		<link>http://datadoodle.com/2009/08/03/lessons-from-lucidera-on-selling-bi-to-the-mid-market/comment-page-1/#comment-633</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil Raden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 17:07:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://datadoodle.com/?p=882#comment-633</guid>
		<description>An old friend, Klaus Mikkelsen once said me, &quot;Neil, don&#039;t forget, the average IQ is 100.&quot;

People in this industry are (generally) pretty smart and it&#039;s easy to overlook the fact that our customers might not all be so smart. This is true in the SMB market, and it&#039;s true in the F500. Sometimes the people who gather information are the more expendable assets or they&#039;d be doing something more creative.

-NR</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An old friend, Klaus Mikkelsen once said me, &#8220;Neil, don&#8217;t forget, the average IQ is 100.&#8221;</p>
<p>People in this industry are (generally) pretty smart and it&#8217;s easy to overlook the fact that our customers might not all be so smart. This is true in the SMB market, and it&#8217;s true in the F500. Sometimes the people who gather information are the more expendable assets or they&#8217;d be doing something more creative.</p>
<p>-NR</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rasmus Madsen</title>
		<link>http://datadoodle.com/2009/08/03/lessons-from-lucidera-on-selling-bi-to-the-mid-market/comment-page-1/#comment-630</link>
		<dc:creator>Rasmus Madsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 19:44:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://datadoodle.com/?p=882#comment-630</guid>
		<description>At youcalc (SaaS analytics vendor) we signed up more than 4,000 customers across the world since our launch Dec &#039;08 - mainly with a freemium offering. (I am sorry I cannot disclose paying subscribers data).

We strongly believe in the freemium model, but it has to match the offering and the sales method. We have no sales team, no customer interaction, and a low price point. We believe this is is right strategy for the main SaaS user base today, but we do see that model change as we start to move up-market in the longer term. You have to be extremely cautious targeting too up-market now - big enterprise is simply not using SaaS for their business data yet.

BI Analyst David Raab just wrote a very clever blog on the differences of our approach vs. other SaaS BI vendors, it&#039;s worth reading: http://customerexperiencematrix.blogspot.com/2009/08/youcalc-on-demand-analytics-without.html

Rasmus Madsen
CEO - www.youcalc.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At youcalc (SaaS analytics vendor) we signed up more than 4,000 customers across the world since our launch Dec &#8217;08 &#8211; mainly with a freemium offering. (I am sorry I cannot disclose paying subscribers data).</p>
<p>We strongly believe in the freemium model, but it has to match the offering and the sales method. We have no sales team, no customer interaction, and a low price point. We believe this is is right strategy for the main SaaS user base today, but we do see that model change as we start to move up-market in the longer term. You have to be extremely cautious targeting too up-market now &#8211; big enterprise is simply not using SaaS for their business data yet.</p>
<p>BI Analyst David Raab just wrote a very clever blog on the differences of our approach vs. other SaaS BI vendors, it&#8217;s worth reading: <a href="http://customerexperiencematrix.blogspot.com/2009/08/youcalc-on-demand-analytics-without.html" rel="nofollow">http://customerexperiencematrix.blogspot.com/2009/08/youcalc-on-demand-analytics-without.html</a></p>
<p>Rasmus Madsen<br />
CEO &#8211; <a href="http://www.youcalc.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.youcalc.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
